01Everyone shops for an SUV on the wrong number
Ask a Malaysian why they picked one SUV over another and road tax comes up within a minute. It is the most discussed running cost in the country. It is also, on our figures, about a twentieth of what the car will actually cost you.
The reason is simple: road tax is visible and depreciation is not. You write a cheque for road tax once a year and you feel it. You lose four times as much every year in resale value and never see an invoice for it. So buyers optimise the number they can see and ignore the number that decides the outcome.
12–21×
Depreciation versus road tax
Across all six SUVs that cleared our quality gates
RM2,659
Cheapest, per year
Perodua Aruz — depreciation plus road tax
RM9,131
Dearest, per year
Honda CR-V — same two costs, 3.4× the Aruz
02What road tax really costs — and the 2,300cc rule nobody knows
Start with the number everyone cares about, because it is the one figure here that is exact rather than estimated. JPJ publishes a fixed schedule, and for a privately registered SUV in Peninsular Malaysia it works like this: flat rates below 1,600cc, then a base rate plus a per-cc charge above it. The rate calculation guide sets out every band.
| Engine capacity | Private SUV (non-saloon) | Private saloon | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 1,000cc | RM 20 | RM 20 | — |
| 1,001–1,200cc | RM 85 | RM 55 | SUV pays RM 30 more |
| 1,201–1,400cc | RM 100 | RM 70 | SUV pays RM 30 more |
| 1,401–1,600cc | RM 120 | RM 90 | SUV pays RM 30 more |
| 1,601–1,800cc | RM 300 + RM 0.30/cc | RM 200 + RM 0.40/cc | SUV pays more |
| 1,801–2,000cc | RM 360 + RM 0.40/cc | RM 280 + RM 0.50/cc | SUV pays more |
| 2,001–2,500cc | RM 440 + RM 0.80/cc | RM 380 + RM 1.00/cc | Crosses over at 2,300cc |
| 2,501–3,000cc | RM 840 + RM 1.60/cc | RM 880 + RM 2.50/cc | SUV pays less |
| Above 3,000cc | RM 1,640 + RM 1.60/cc | RM 2,130 + RM 4.50/cc | SUV pays much less |
That matters because almost every SUV Malaysians actually buy sits below 2,300cc. The compact-SUV segment is built on 1.5-litre turbo and 2.0-litre engines, which means the segment as a whole is on the wrong side of the crossover. The road-tax advantage people believe they are buying mostly does not exist at this size.
What the six SUVs in this study actually pay
| Model | Median engine size in our listings | Road tax per year | Over five years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perodua Aruz | 1,500cc | RM 120.00 | RM 600 |
| Proton X70 | 1,799cc | RM 359.70 | RM 1,798 |
| Honda HR-V | 1,799cc | RM 359.70 | RM 1,798 |
| Honda CR-V | 1,997cc | RM 438.80 | RM 2,194 |
| Mazda CX-5 | 1,998cc | RM 439.20 | RM 2,196 |
| Mazda CX-30 | 1,998cc | RM 439.20 | RM 2,196 |
03What depreciation really costs
Now the invisible half. We measure it from our own market snapshot — 340,782 Malaysian listings as of 14 August 2026 — by fitting a depreciation curve across model-year cohorts and separately reading the observed price ladder, then publishing only the models where those two independent methods agree.
| Model | About 1 year old | About 5 years old | Lost over 5 years | Per year | Retention | Listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perodua Aruz | RM 56,877 | RM 44,184 | RM 12,693 | RM 2,539 | 71.4% | 1,295 |
| Mazda CX-30 | RM 104,310 | RM 78,509 | RM 25,801 | RM 5,160 | 72.8% | 668 |
| Proton X70 | RM 77,823 | RM 47,487 | RM 30,336 | RM 6,067 | 65.4% | 1,776 |
| Honda HR-V | RM 95,387 | RM 59,570 | RM 35,817 | RM 7,163 | 65.8% | 2,347 |
| Mazda CX-5 | RM 115,373 | RM 75,661 | RM 39,712 | RM 7,942 | 64.4% | 2,765 |
| Honda CR-V | RM 125,152 | RM 81,692 | RM 43,460 | RM 8,692 | 69.3% | 2,439 |
Notice that retention percentage and ringgit loss disagree again. The CR-V holds 69.3% of its value, a better figure than the X70's 65.4% — and still loses RM13,124 more, because it starts RM47,000 dearer. A percentage is only meaningful next to the price it applies to.
04Side by side: the actual ranking
Add the two costs we can state precisely and the ordering barely resembles the road-tax table. The cheapest SUV to run is not the one with the smallest engine — it is the one that loses the least money.
| Perodua Aruz | Mazda CX-30 | Proton X70 | Honda HR-V | Mazda CX-5 | Honda CR-V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation, 5 years | RM 12,693 | RM 25,801 | RM 30,336 | RM 35,817 | RM 39,712 | RM 43,460 |
| Road tax, 5 years | RM 600 | RM 2,196 | RM 1,798 | RM 1,798 | RM 2,196 | RM 2,194 |
| Measured total | RM 13,293 | RM 27,997 | RM 32,134 | RM 37,616 | RM 41,908 | RM 45,654 |
| Per year | RM 2,659 | RM 5,599 | RM 6,427 | RM 7,523 | RM 8,382 | RM 9,131 |
| Road tax as share | 4.5% | 7.8% | 5.6% | 4.8% | 5.2% | 4.8% |
| Depreciation ÷ road tax | 21.2× | 11.7× | 16.9× | 19.9× | 18.1× | 19.8× |
05Fuel and servicing: real costs that cannot reorder this table
Two costs are missing from the ranking above, and it is fair to ask whether they would change it. We think they would not, and the arithmetic is worth showing rather than asserting.
Fuel
Official combined consumption across this class runs roughly from 6.4 litres per 100 km for the Aruz and the CX-30 to about 7.6 for the X70 1.8 turbo. Over 100,000 km that is a spread of about 1,200 litres. At the subsidised RON95 price of RM1.99 a litre, published in the official fuel price series, that is roughly RM2,400 — against a depreciation spread of RM30,767.
Even on a deliberately generous assumption — a full 3 litres per 100 km between the thirstiest and the most frugal SUV here — five years of fuel would separate them by about RM5,970 at subsidised prices. That is still less than a fifth of the depreciation gap, so fuel cannot lift the CR-V above the Aruz or drop the Aruz below anything.
Servicing
Published five-year, 100,000 km servicing totals for this class cluster tightly: about RM3,874 for a Honda HR-V on semi-synthetic oil, RM4,327 for a Proton X50 and RM4,588 for a Proton X70, per a side-by-side comparison of the manufacturers' schedules. Switching the HR-V to fully synthetic takes it to RM4,599 and erases the gap entirely.
The shape of the conclusion survives all of it. Fuel and servicing across this class differ by low thousands of ringgit over five years. Depreciation differs by RM30,767. Any ranking that leaves depreciation out is measuring the small stuff.
06How to use this when you shop
None of this says buy an Aruz. It says price the whole cost, and be honest about which parts of it you can actually control.
- 1
Rank on money lost, not on engine size
Ask what the model you want was worth new and what the five-year-old ones are asking now. That gap, divided by five, is your largest annual cost — usually before you have driven anywhere.
- 2
Buy the depreciation someone else has already paid
The steepest ringgit loss on every SUV here happens early. A CR-V's first five years cost RM43,460 in value; buying the five-year-old car hands that bill to the previous owner.
- 3
Check the variant, not just the model
The 1.5-litre turbo CR-V pays RM120 a year in road tax where the 2.0 pays RM438.80. Within a model, the variant is where the road-tax decision actually lives.
- 4
Only sweat road tax above 2,300cc
Below that line the differences are tens of ringgit a year and an SUV pays more than an equivalent saloon anyway. Above it, the schedule turns sharply and the number starts to matter.
- 5
Weigh safety and space against the total, not the sticker
Cost is one axis. Published ASEAN NCAP results are another, and a cheap SUV that does not fit your family is not cheap. Use the total cost to compare cars that already meet your requirements.
07How we measured it, and what we could not publish
We tested eighteen SUVs. Six survived. Naming the twelve that did not is more useful than quietly dropping them, because the reasons say something about the market.
What a model had to clear to appear above:
- Enough model years and depth — at least six model-year cohorts, 200 listings, and a six-year age span, so the curve describes a real range rather than two adjacent years.
- Fit quality — an R-squared floor on two separate formulations of the fit, one anchored and one anchor-free.
- No clamp-pinned curves — our estimator bounds monthly rates, and a curve resting on that boundary is a limit of the method, not a measurement.
- Corroboration — a fitted curve and an observed price ladder computed independently, agreeing within 15 points. Where they disagree by more, we do not publish the model.
| Excluded | Why |
|---|---|
| Proton X50 | Two methods disagreed by 25 points. On sale only since 2020, so a five-year curve is extrapolated rather than observed. |
| Nissan X-Trail | Fitted curve implied implausible retention; failed the fit-quality floor. |
| Toyota Harrier | Supply is dominated by imports with a different price history from locally distributed cars. |
| Perodua Ativa, Toyota Rush, Honda BR-V | Too few model years in the market to define a five-year curve. |
| Mazda CX-3, CX-8, Mitsubishi Outlander, Subaru XV | Failed the sample-depth or clamp guards. |
| Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson | Insufficient depth in the recent cohorts a five-year claim depends on. |
Limits worth knowing about the figures we did publish:
- They are asking prices, not transaction prices. Malaysian sellers negotiate, so real spreads are a little tighter.
- They are a cross-section — what different model years ask today — not a record of watching one car lose value over time. Our snapshot spans weeks, not years.
- Road tax is exact but Peninsular-only. Sabah and Sarawak use a separate, lower schedule; see the JPJ renewal guide.
- Insurance is excluded entirely. Premiums have been individually priced since liberalisation, so any single figure we quoted would be closer to a guess than a measurement.
- The CX-30's 668 listings are the thinnest sample we published. It clears the gates but carries more uncertainty than the CX-5 or CR-V rows.
If you want this arithmetic for a specific car rather than a model average, run a Carvaly valuation for estimated retail, private-sale, and trade-in ranges on your exact model, year, mileage and condition. The running-cost tables above are editorial analysis, not how that valuation is calculated. Understanding your Carvaly valuation explains how to read a result. For retention rather than running cost, our SUV league table ranks the same segment on what it keeps, and current listings show what these SUVs ask.
Frequently asked questions
Which SUV is cheapest to run in Malaysia?
On the two costs we can state precisely — depreciation and road tax — the Perodua Aruz, at about RM2,659 a year over five years. The Honda CR-V is dearest at RM9,131 a year, roughly 3.4 times as much. The gap is almost entirely depreciation: the Aruz loses RM12,693 of value over five years against the CR-V's RM43,460.
Do SUVs really pay less road tax than saloons in Malaysia?
Only above 2,300cc. At exactly 2,300cc both pay RM680 a year. Below that line an SUV pays more than a saloon with the same engine — a 1,500cc SUV pays RM120 against a 1,500cc saloon's RM90. Since most SUVs Malaysians buy are 1.5 to 2.0 litres, the segment mostly sits on the wrong side of the crossover.
How much is road tax for a 2.0-litre SUV in Peninsular Malaysia?
For a privately registered non-saloon at 1,998cc it is RM439.20 a year: a base of RM360 for the 1,801–2,000cc band plus RM0.40 for each cc above 1,800. A 1,799cc SUV pays RM359.70 and a 1,500cc SUV pays a flat RM120. Sabah and Sarawak use a separate, lower schedule.
Is depreciation really more important than road tax when choosing an SUV?
By a wide margin. Across the six SUVs we measured, depreciation was between 12 and 21 times road tax, and road tax was only 4.5% to 7.8% of the two costs combined. The depreciation gap between the cheapest and dearest SUV here is RM30,767 over five years; the road tax gap is RM1,596.
Does a smaller engine make an SUV cheaper to own?
Not on its own. It reduces road tax by a few hundred ringgit a year and usually reduces fuel a little, but neither is large enough to overcome a difference in resale value. The Mazda CX-30 and the Honda CR-V have almost identical engine sizes and road tax, and the CR-V loses RM17,659 more over five years.
Why is the Proton X50 missing from this running-cost table?
Because the depreciation half of its five-year cost cannot be measured yet. Our two independent estimates of its retention disagreed by 25 points, well beyond the 15-point limit we publish within — the X50 has only been on sale since 2020, so there are not enough older cohorts to observe a five-year curve rather than extrapolate one. Its road tax and fuel figures would be sound; the largest line in the bill would be a guess.
Sources and references
- Carvaly: Understanding your Carvaly valuation
- JPJ Malaysia: Motor Vehicle Licence Rate Calculation Guide
- JPJ Malaysia: Motor Vehicle License Renewal Guide (LKM)
- data.gov.my: Price of Petroleum and Diesel
- Paul Tan's Automotive News: Proton X50 versus X70 and Honda HR-V: Servicing Costs Over Five Years
- Bank Negara Malaysia: Liberalisation of Motor Insurance
- ASEAN NCAP: Vehicle Safety Results
